Anything you tell your lawyer to get his advice, is confidential. In
other words the lawyer is prevented by law from revealing this information
to anyone else. This restriction on the lawyer's ability to disclose this
information is called "solicitor client privilege". The reason for this rule
is that without it people would be afraid to disclose anything to their
lawyers and that fear would weaken the administration of justice.
Even a court can not force a lawyer to reveal what his client has told him
or her. This restriction applies even if the information accidentally comes
into the hands of a third party or the opponent in a lawsuit - it still can
not be used in court. A lawyer's employees are equally prohibited from
disclosing the client's information and if they do the person receiving the
information will be ordered by the court not to use it.
Any discussion that a lawyer has with a client about the bill is considered
just as confidential as talking about the case. The ban on disclosure
continues after the lawyer's representation of the client is over. However
if two people hire a lawyer together, each person is entitled to know what
the lawyer tells the other.
Sometimes clients will visit their lawyers with a friend. If the friend is
present when the information is disclosed to the lawyer there will be no
restriction on the friend using the information. By revealing the
information in front of the friend the client has voluntarily waived the
privilege on the information.
There are two exceptions to the privilege rule. The privacy protection is
lost when the client tries to get a lawyer's advice about committing a
crime. It is also lost when the client voluntarily permits the lawyer to
disclose the information. Sometimes this might occur indirectly. For
example, in the course of giving evidence in a law suit a client might
reveal some of the discussions with his lawyer. In that circumstance a Court
could decide that the client's disclosure eliminated the solicitor client
privilege and require the client to reveal further information, if asked.
The privilege can also apply to professions other than lawyers such as a
doctor or minister, but in these cases the privilege will not occur
automatically. This question of privilege will usually arise during a trial
when someone will try to introduce evidence of statements an individual made
to a doctor or priest. In those circumstances the Court will decide whether
to permit the information to be revealed, after considering the following:
a) does society want that relationship (with doctor or priest) kept private
and is privacy essential to it;
b) will keeping this information confidential do the most good;
c) was the communication meant to be private.
If the answer to all of these is yes, the information will not be permitted
into the trial. The distinction with lawyer privilege is that these
questions do not have to be asked. The privilege is automatically present.
Privilege can also apply to information a lawyer receives from a third party
in aid of the client's case. This is particularly so when it occurs in the
context of litigation. If a lawyer hires a professional to provide an expert
opinion regarding a client's lawsuit, that information is privileged i.e.
private unless the expert's opinion id provided to the court or opposing
counsel. Once that occurs privilege is lifted.
For a free consultation regarding your legal matters contact us today.